What
to Use,
Primary or Secondary Sources?

During the course of your research, you might be asked to use primary and secondary sources. 'What is the difference?', you ask. Primary sources are those which were written during the period in which the information occurred. Secondary sources, however, are those reviews and accounts that were written after an event occurred.
|
Primary |
Secondary |
|
Primary sources are not necessarily the sources you
primarly use, but they are the most fundamental information on the subject. |
Secondary sources analyze and interpret primary sources
and are used primarily for presenting the views of others about your
primary sources. |
|
Published at the time the event occurred, by someone
involved in the actual event |
Written about an event after it occurred |
|
For historical events, a primary source on Abraham
Lincoln would be either one written by Lincoln (such as The Gettysburg
Address) or by someone who knew Lincoln. They could be documents or
artifacts created during the time period. |
For historical events, a secondary source on Abraham
Lincoln could be a book, magazine article, or internet site written
after his death. |
|
Scientific research is often a primary source if it
is written by the scientist who did the research and it includes information
such as methods, materials, discussion, results, and conclusion. An
example of this would be an article published in The Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences. |
Some examples of secondary sources may be a critical review
of Shakespeare's Hamlet or an article written in Science
News about a scientific discovery that was reported in another
publication. |